The reading starts out introducing Stanly Kaplan, and
listing some of the things he has accomplished. It links his name to test preparation, and explains
how the article will go into detail about how he got started with the SAT. Kaplan found himself intrigued by this test
after tutoring a high school junior named Elizabeth. While Kaplan was teaching her algebra, she
asked him if he could help her prepare for the SAT. This leads Kaplan to do research and look
over the booklet given to him by Elizabeth.
He reads the sample questions and comes to a conclusion that the
questions on this tests required students to apply their knowledge to basic
concepts, instead of asking for information that could be memorized. Kaplan sat down and made up his own questions
that would challenge Elizabeth, and would require her think harder. The article went on to describe the SAT in
depth. It stated when the test was
given, and how it was scored. It also
informed the reader that the test was not always used in the admission process
to colleges. The more widespread the test got, the more universities that
required it. Kaplan also concluded that
the SAT used information that is studied over a significant amount of school
years. The student would not only have
to know the information, but know how to apply it. He believed the SAT provided a level playing
field for students. He then went on to
describe the foundation of the College Board.
They believed that no matter how many times the student took the test,
their results would remain the same, and it was a predictable outcome of how
they would perform in college. Lastly, he described how the College Board
developed the Educational Testing Service, the foundation that writes,
administers, and scores the SAT. Overall, Kaplan found that his tutoring
business greatly flourished as the popularity of the SAT hit an all-time high.
I believe
Kaplan’s argument was against the statement in the SAT booklet that said “cramming
and last minute reviewing had no purpose”.
He wondered why the College Board would include that statement, and that
is what sparked his interest. He
believed that he could come up with a significant way to study effectively for
the SAT. Kaplan argued this point very
well. He took time to do intense
research on the type of questions asked, and what was required to answer them. He looked through sample questions, and then
sat down to write his own. He used these
questions to help prepare students and get their brain into the mindset of
applying knowledge. What I took from
this article was that if the statement made by the College Board happened to be
true, then why did Kaplan’s tutoring business expand so rapidly when the SAT
became the primary test scores looked at when applying to college. What I would like to know that was not
mentioned in this article was how well the students scored on their tests after
they went through his tutoring sessions.
` I agree
with what Stanly Kaplan is saying. I do
believe that there is always something you can do to prepare yourself and
better your test scores, no matter what type of questions are asked. I also believe that by doing sample
questions, your mind will better be prepared when reading questions on the
test, rather than being shocked. It is
always better to go into a test, especially one as significant as the SAT, with
an understanding of that is expected. This
reading did a very impressive job of explaining to readers how and why the SAT
was created, and the process of how it got to be so important. I believe it is a good test to take, and will
help colleges know what to expect from you as a student. The questions on this test were honestly some
of the most challenging questions I have ever been asked, and I do think it is
good to expose students to that before they start college.
The
golden line I chose from this article was that the SAT “could help democratize
American education by ushering a larger, more diverse group of students into
the world of higher education”. I chose this statement because I think it is
really important to not only focus on a student’s background or other
circumstances, but to make a single standardized test with unique questions.
This gives students the opportunity to apply themselves in a way they never
have previously. Each student starts out
equal to each other, and gives them all the same chance at being successful.
Kayla, you did a great job with analyzing Stanley Kaplan's work. I think you really understand what affect Mr. Kaplan has had on the SAT and you actually got something out of this passage. I can relate as far as agreeing with his approaches and beliefs. I believe preparation is the key to success and hardwork beats talent when talent does not work hard. You stated that each student starts out equal to each other, but do you think that maybe some people have more of an advantage than others, as far as resources and the help they receive?
ReplyDeleteI really like how your response to this article was broad, but at the same time very specific to the point of your favorite line in the article. When I read about how they said not to cram or do any last minute reviewing, I came up with a slightly different response. I took that statement to mean that students should not cram all their studying into one week before the test. Instead, students should gradually review everything that they have learned in high school. I think that the points that you brought up were very inquisitive.
ReplyDelete